Web site Developer I Advertising and marketing I Social Media Advertising and marketing I Content material Creators I Branding Creators I Administration I System SolutionAVIF And WebP — Smashing Journal

Web site Developer I Advertising and marketing I Social Media Advertising and marketing I Content material Creators I Branding Creators I Administration I System SolutionAVIF And WebP — Smashing Journal

Web site Developer I Advertising and marketing I Social Media Advertising and marketing I Content material Creators I Branding Creators I Administration I System Answer

Fast abstract ↬

On this article, we’ll spotlight how trendy picture codecs (AVIF or WebP) can enhance compression by as much as 50% and ship higher high quality per-byte whereas nonetheless trying visually interesting. We’ll examine what’s doable at high-quality, low-quality and file-size targets.

Photos are the hottest useful resource sort on the internet and are sometimes the biggest. Customers respect high-quality visuals, however care must be taken to ship these hero photos, product images and cat memes as effectively and successfully as doable.

In the event you’re optimizing for the Net Vitals, you could be to listen to that photos account for ~42% of the Largest Contentful Paint aspect for web sites. Key user-centric metrics typically rely upon the dimensions, quantity, structure, and loading precedence of photos on the web page. That is why a whole lot of our steering on efficiency talks about picture optimization.

A tl;dr of suggestions will be discovered beneath.


  • AVIF is a stable first alternative if lossy, low-fidelity compression is suitable and saving bandwidth is the primary precedence. Assuming encode/decode speeds meet your wants.
  • WebP is extra extensively supported and could also be used for rendering common photos the place superior options like broad shade gamut or textual content overlays aren’t required.
  • AVIF might not be capable of compress non-photographic photos in addition to PNG or lossless WebP. Compression financial savings from WebP could also be decrease than JPEG for high-fidelity lossy compression.
  • If each AVIF and WebP aren’t viable choices, think about evaluating MozJPEG (optimize JPEG photos), OxiPNG (non-photographic photos), or JPEG 2000 (lossy or lossless photographic photos).
  • Progressive enhancement by way of <image> lets the browser select the primary supported format within the order of desire. This implementation is significantly simplified when utilizing picture CDN’s the place the Settle for Header and content material negotiation (e.g. auto-format and high quality) can serve the most effective picture.

Why Do We Want Trendy Codecs?

We now have a fairly broad choice of picture codecs to select from when rendering photos on the internet. The important distinction between picture codecs is that the picture codec used to encode or decode every picture sort is totally different. A picture codec represents the algorithm used to compress and encode photos to a particular file sort and decode them for show on the display screen.

Evaluating Codecs

You possibly can consider which picture format is appropriate for you based mostly on totally different parameters.

  • Compression
    The effectivity of a codec will be primarily measured by how a lot compression it will possibly obtain. Compression achieved is related as a result of the upper the compression, the smaller the file measurement, and the decrease the info required to switch the picture on the community. Smaller file measurement straight impacts the Largest contentful Paint (LCP) metric for the web page as picture assets wanted by the web page get loaded sooner.
  • High quality
    Ideally, compression shouldn’t lead to any lack of picture knowledge; it ought to be lossless. Compression codecs that lead to some lack of picture knowledge, thereby lowering the standard of the picture, are often called lossy. You could use instruments like DSSIM or ssimulacra to measure the structural similarity between photos and choose if the loss in high quality is suitable.
  • Encode/Decode Velocity
    Advanced compression algorithms might require increased processing energy to encode/decode photos. This may be sophisticated by whether or not encoding is being accomplished forward of time (static/construct) or on-the-fly (on-demand). Whereas encoding could also be one-time within the case of static photos, the browser nonetheless has to decode photos earlier than rendering them. A fancy decoding course of can decelerate the rendering of photos.

Diploma of compression, picture high quality, and decoding pace are key elements to be thought-about when evaluating picture efficiency for the online. Particular use circumstances might require picture codecs that assist different options like:

  • Software program assist: A picture format might carry out very effectively however is ineffective if browsers, CDN’s and different picture manipulation instruments don’t acknowledge it.
  • Animation assist could also be required for some photos on the internet (e.g., GIF). Nonetheless, it’s best to ideally exchange such photos with movies.
  • Alpha Transparency: The power to create photos with totally different opacity ranges utilizing the alpha channel. (e.g., PNG photos with clear backgrounds)
  • It ought to assist Excessive dynamic vary(HDR) imaging and broad shade gamut.
  • Progressive decoding to load photos step by step permits customers to get an affordable preview of the picture earlier than it will get refined.
  • Depth maps that can allow you to use results to the foreground or background of the picture.
  • Photos with a number of overlapping layers, for instance, textual content overlays, borders, and so forth.

Tip: When evaluating high quality, compression and fine-tuning of recent codecs, Squoosh.app’s capability to carry out a visible side-by-side comparability is useful. Zooming in permits you to higher respect the place a format displays blockiness or edge-artifacts to motive about trade-offs.

Squoosh.app with the ability to perform a visual side-by-side comparison

(Massive preview)

The Previous Guards: JPEG And PNG

JPEG has been essentially the most extensively supported picture format for 25 years. Basic JPEG encoders result in comparatively weak compression, whereas extra trendy JPEG encoding efforts (like MozJPEG) enhance compression however aren’t fairly as optimum as trendy codecs. JPEG can be a lossy compression format. Whereas decoding pace for JPEGs is superb, it lacks different fascinating options required of photos on trendy, eye-catching web sites. It doesn’t assist transparency in photos, animation, depth maps, or overlays.

JPEG works finest with pictures, whereas PNG is its counterpart for different nonetheless photos. PNG is a lossless format and might assist alpha transparency, however the compression achieved, particularly for pictures, is significantly low. JPEG and PNG are each used extensively relying on the kind of picture required.

The goal for contemporary picture codecs is thus to beat the constraints of JPEG and PNG by providing higher compression and adaptability to assist the opposite options mentioned earlier. With this background, allow us to take a look at what AVIF and WebP have to supply.

Extra after soar! Proceed studying beneath ↓


The AV1 picture file format (AVIF) is an open-source picture format for storing nonetheless and animated photos. It was launched in February 2019 by the Alliance for Open Media (AOMedia). AVIF is the picture model of the favored AV1 video format. The objective was to develop a brand new open-source video coding format that’s each state-of-the-art and royalty-free.

AVIF Advantages

AVIF helps very environment friendly lossy and lossless compression to supply high-quality photos after compression AVIF compresses a lot better than hottest codecs on the internet right now (JPEG, WebP, JPEG 2000, and so forth). Photos will be as much as ten occasions smaller than JPEGs of comparable visible high quality. Some checks have proven that AVIF affords a 50% saving in file measurement in comparison with JPEG with comparable perceptual high quality. Observe that there will be circumstances the place WebP lossless will be higher than AVIF lossless, so do make sure you manually consider.

Right here, you possibly can see a measurement comparability between a JPEG picture and its corresponding (lossy) AVIF picture transformed utilizing the Squoosh app:

size comparison between a JPEG image and an AVIF image on Squoosh app

(Massive preview)

size comparison between a JPEG image and an AVIF image on Squoosh app

(Massive preview)

Along with superior compression, AVIF additionally gives the next options:

  • AVIF helps animations, stay images, and extra by way of multilayer photos saved in picture sequences.
  • It affords higher assist for graphical parts, logos, and infographics, the place JPEG has limitations.
  • It gives higher lossless compression than JPEG.
  • It helps twelve bits of shade depth enabling excessive dynamic vary (HDR) and broad shade gamut (WCG) photos with a greater span of shiny and darkish tones and a broader vary of luminosity.
  • It contains assist for monochrome photos and multichannel photos, together with clear photos that use the alpha channel.

Evaluating Codecs

To higher perceive the variations in high quality and compression supplied by the totally different codecs, we will visually examine photos and consider the variations.

Evaluating High quality And Compression

We are going to start our high quality analysis of JPEG, WebP, and AVIF utilizing the default high-quality output settings of Squoosh for every format — deliberately untuned to imitate a brand new consumer’s expertise with them. As a reminder, it’s best to goal to guage the standard configuration and codecs that finest fit your wants. In the event you’re quick on time, picture CDNs automate a few of this.

On this first take a look at, encoding a 560KB photograph of a sundown (with many textures) produces a picture that’s visually and perceptually fairly comparable for every. The output is available in at 289KB (JPEG@q75), 206KB (WebP@q75), and 101KB (AVIF@q30) — as much as 81% in compression financial savings.

Nice stuff, however let’s dig deeper.

See the Pen [Image format comparison 2](https://codepen.io/smashingmag/pen/WNOPpbd) by Addy Osmani.

See the Pen Picture format comparability 2 by Addy Osmani.

Varied instruments exist for evaluating the dissimilarity between totally different picture codecs (e.g., DSSIM, simulacra). Utilizing these instruments, you possibly can approximate the comparable high quality setting when evaluating, say, JPEG to WebP or WebP to AVIF. Under are the identical photos encoded at comparable high quality, concentrating on JPEG’s 70% high quality. The output is 323KB (JPEG), 214KB (WebP@q75), and 117KB (AVIF@60) — sizes are somewhat bigger than trusting the defaults, however the compression wins are nonetheless important.

See the Pen [Image format comparison 2a (quality)](https://codepen.io/smashingmag/pen/NWgopqw) by Addy Osmani.

See the Pen Picture format comparability 2a (high quality) by Addy Osmani.

We will additionally take a look at lower-quality throughout every format, which is admittedly the place WebP and AVIF shine. Right here’s JPEG@q10 (35KB), WebP@q1 (35KB), AVIF@q17 (36KB) — the WebP has considerably fewer blocky artifacts in comparison with the JPEG, whereas the AVIF is each much less blocky and is sharper on key particulars within the picture.

See the Pen [Image format comparison 2d (quality)](https://codepen.io/smashingmag/pen/GREzWpN) by Addy Osmani.

See the Pen Picture format comparability 2nd (high quality) by Addy Osmani.

Observe: This sundown is a better decision picture (2400×1595), and on 2× screens, the standard could possibly be a lot decrease and nonetheless look sharp relying on how customers work together with the picture (e.g., how a lot they pinch and zoom).

screenshot of an image on the Squoosh app

(Massive preview)

For a extra excessive instance of the variations between JPEG and AVIF, we will take a look at an instance from the Kodak dataset (evaluated by Netflix) evaluating a JPEG (4:4:4) at 20KB to an AVIF (4:4:4) at 19.8KB. Discover how the JPEG has seen blocky artifacts within the sky and roof. The AVIF is visibly higher, containing fewer blocking artifacts. There’s, nevertheless, a stage of texture loss on the roof and a few blurriness. It’s nonetheless fairly spectacular, given the general compression issue is 59x.

See the Pen [Image format comparison 4a (netflix)](https://codepen.io/smashingmag/pen/abwXJvg) by Addy Osmani.

See the Pen Picture format comparability 4a (netflix) by Addy Osmani.

Subsequent, let’s consider the standard of a seashore picture with many tremendous particulars, textures, and areas of low distinction within the clouds. We are going to examine the unique (at 482KB) to what JPEG, WebP, and AVIF can produce with a 45KB file-size restrict (with no superior tuning) — utilizing Squoosh; this works out at JPEG (MozJPEG) at 50% high quality, WebP at 54%, and AVIF at 36%.

See the Pen [Image format comparison 3a (size)](https://codepen.io/smashingmag/pen/rNwPyxP) by Addy Osmani.

See the Pen Picture format comparability 3a (measurement) by Addy Osmani.

The JPEG has blocky artifacts and visual shade banding within the clouds and water, whereas the WebP and AVIF have noticeably much less of this blockiness observable. For my part, the AVIF affords the general smoothest expertise of all three.

See the Pen [Image format comparison 3a (crop)](https://codepen.io/smashingmag/pen/jOwdBqx) by Addy Osmani.

See the Pen Picture format comparability 3a (crop) by Addy Osmani.

Talking of textures, we will additionally carry out an analogous lower-quality analysis on a Netflix poster for “The Witcher” (concentrating on 36KB). Discover the blockiness within the clouds for the JPEG and a few blurriness across the purple textual content for WebP (which solely helps 4:2:0 chroma subsampling with out workarounds). The AVIF appears finest, adopted by the WebP.

See the Pen [Image format comparison 5a (size)](https://codepen.io/smashingmag/pen/dyRavXY) by Addy Osmani.

See the Pen Picture format comparability 5a (measurement) by Addy Osmani.

Lastly, let’s take a look at a photograph with much more textual content parts than earlier photos — a poster. Once we go right down to decrease qualities and goal a fairly small measurement (25KB), we will observe that the JPEG has robust shade banding and halos across the textual content. There are clear blocky artifacts across the edges. The WebP avoids an quantity of the blockiness, trying incrementally higher. The AVIF preserves the sharp edges somewhat higher than both JPEG or WebP, producing a easy picture.

See the Pen [Image format comparison 4a (size)](https://codepen.io/smashingmag/pen/WNOPpxM) by Addy Osmani.

See the Pen Picture format comparability 4a (measurement) by Addy Osmani.

Extra format vs high quality comparisons can be found for pictures and illustrations.

AVIF Tooling And Help

Since its launch in 2019, the assist for AVIF has elevated significantly. Whereas there was no direct technique to create or view AVIF information earlier, you possibly can simply achieve this now with the open-source utilities accessible.

AVIF Photos In The Browser

AVIF was launched on the desktop model of Chrome in August 2020 with Chrome 85. It is usually supported on Chrome for Android, Opera and Firefox for desktop, and Opera for Android.

AVIF images in the browser

(Massive preview)

To incorporate an AVIF picture in your web page, you possibly can add it as a picture aspect. Nonetheless, browsers that don’t assist AVIF can’t render this picture.

<img src="https://smashingmagazine.com/images/sky.avif" width="360" peak="240" alt="a gorgeous sky">

A workaround to make sure that a minimum of one supported picture format is delivered to all browsers is to use AVIF as a progressive enhancement. There are two methods to do that.

Progressive Enhancement
  1. Utilizing The <image> Component
    As <image> permits browsers to skip photos they don’t acknowledge, you possibly can embody photos in your order of desire. The browser selects the primary one it helps.
    <supply srcset=“img/photograph.avif” sort=“picture/avif”>
    <supply srcset=“img/photograph.webp” sort=“picture/webp”>
    <img src=“img/photograph.jpg” alt=“Description” width=“360” peak=“240”>
  2. Utilizing Content material Negotiation
    Content material negotiation permits the server to serve totally different useful resource codecs based mostly on what’s supported by the browser. Browsers that assist a particular format can announce it by including the format to their Settle for Request Header. E.g., the Settle for Request Header for photos in Chrome is:
    Settle for: picture/avif,picture/webp,picture/apng,picture/*,*/*;q=0.8
    The code to examine if AVIF is supported within the fetch occasion handler can look one thing like this:
    const hdrAccept = occasion.request.headers.get("settle for");
    const sendAVIF = /picture/avif/.take a look at(hdrAccept);
    You should utilize this worth to serve AVIF or every other default format to the shopper.

Creating the markup for progressive enhancement will be daunting. Picture CDN’s supply the choice to mechanically serve the most effective format appropriate to the shopper. Nonetheless, in case you are not utilizing a picture CDN, you possibly can think about using a device like just-gimme-an-img. This device can generate the markup for the image aspect for a given picture with totally different codecs and widths. It additionally creates the pictures similar to the markup utilizing Squoosh solely client-side. Observe: encoding a number of codecs can take some time utilizing it, so that you would possibly need to seize a espresso when you wait.

markup for the picture element for a given image with different formats and widths.

(Massive preview)

Observe: Picture CDNs are talked about a couple of occasions on this article. CDN servers are sometimes positioned nearer to customers than origin servers and might have a shorter round-trip occasions (RTT), bettering community latency. That mentioned, serving from a special origin can add round-trips and influence efficiency beneficial properties. This can be tremendous if the CDN is serving different website content material, however when doubtful, experiment and measure.

Encode And Decode AVIF Recordsdata

A number of open-source initiatives present totally different strategies to encode/decode AVIF information:

  • Libraries
    Libaom is the open-source encoder and decoder maintained by AOMedia, the creators of AVIF. The library is repeatedly up to date with new optimizations that goal to scale back the price of encoding AVIF, particularly for continuously loaded or high-priority photos. Libavif is an open-source muxer and parser for AVIF utilized in Chrome for decoding AVIF photos. You should utilize libavif with libaom to create AVIF information from authentic uncompressed photos or transcode them from different codecs. There’s additionally Libheif, a well-liked AVIF/HEIF encoder/decoder and Cavif. Because of Ben Morss, libgd helps AVIF and can be coming to PHP in November.
  • Net Apps And Desktop Apps
    Squoosh, an online app that permits you to use totally different picture compressors, additionally helps AVIF, making it comparatively simple to transform and create .avif information on-line. On desktop, GIMP helps AVIF exporting. ImageMagick and Paint.web additionally assist AVIF whereas Photoshop group plugins for AVIF are additionally accessible.
  • JavaScript Libraries
    • AVIF.js is an AVIF polyfill for browsers that don’t assist AVIF but. It makes use of Service Employee API to intercept the fetch occasion and decode AVIF information.
    • Avif.io is one other internet utility that may convert information from totally different picture varieties to AVIF on the client-side. It calls Rust code within the browser utilizing a WebWorker. The converter library is compiled to WASM utilizing wasm-pack.
    • Sharp is a Node.js module that may convert massive photos in normal codecs to smaller web-friendly photos, together with AVIF photos.
  • Utilities
    Picture conversion or transformation utilities assist the AVIF format. You should utilize MP4Box to create and decode AVIF information.
  • In Code
    go-avif implements an AVIF encoder for Go utilizing libaom. It comes with a utility referred to as avif which might encode JPEG or PNG information to AVIF.

Anybody enthusiastic about studying the way to create AVIF photos utilizing Squoosh or constructing the command line encoder avifenc can achieve this on the codelab on serving AVIF information.

AVIF And Efficiency

AVIF can cut back the file measurement of photos as a result of higher compression. Because of this, AVIF information obtain sooner and eat decrease bandwidth. This will probably enhance efficiency by lowering the time to load photos.

Lighthouse-best practices audit now considers that AVIF picture compression can deliver important enhancements. It collects all of the BMP, JPEG, and PNG photos on the web page, converts them to WebP and estimates the AVIF file measurement. This estimate helps Lighthouse report the potential financial savings below the “Serve photos in next-gen codecs” part.

Lighthouse-best practices audit under the 'Serve images in next-gen formats' section.

(Massive preview)

Tim Vereecke reported 25% byte financial savings and a optimistic influence on LCP (in comparison with JPEG) after changing 14 million photos on the web site to AVIF measured utilizing Actual Consumer Monitoring (RUM).

AVIF Gotchas

The largest downside for AVIF at current is that it lacks uniform assist throughout browsers. Introducing AVIF as a progressive enhancement helps overcome this. A number of different facets through which AVIF doesn’t meet the perfect requirements for a contemporary file format.

  • Trendy variations of Chrome (Chrome 94+) do assist AVIF progressive rendering whereas older variations don’t. Whereas on the time of writing there isn’t an encoder that may make these photos simply, there’s hope this may change.
  • AVIF photos take longer to encode and create. This could possibly be an issue for websites that create photos information dynamically. Nonetheless, the AVIF group is engaged on bettering encoding speeds. AVIF contributors at Google have additionally reported some good efficiency beneficial properties. Since Jan 1st 2021, AVIF encoding had a ~47% enchancment in transcode time (that is pace 6, the present default for libavif) and throughout the calendar yr a 73% enchancment. Since July, there’s additionally been a 72% enchancment in transcode occasions at pace 9 (on-the-fly-encoding).

report on AVIF’s improvement in transcode time

(Massive preview)
  • Decoding AVIF photos for show may also take up extra CPU energy than different codecs, although smaller file sizes might compensate for this.
  • Some CDNs don’t but assist AVIF by default for his or her automated format modes as a result of it will possibly nonetheless be slower to generate on the primary request.


We now have talked about WebP a couple of occasions, however let’s briefly cowl its historical past. Google created the WebP format in 2011 as a picture format that may assist to make the online sooner. Through the years, it has been accepted and adopted extensively due to its capability to compress photos to decrease file sizes in comparison with JPEG and PNG. WebP affords each lossless and lossy compression at an appropriate visible high quality and helps alpha-channel transparency and animation.

Lossy WebP compression is predicated on the VP8 video codec and makes use of predictive encoding to encode a picture. It makes use of values within the neighboring blocks of pixels to foretell the worth in a block and encodes solely the distinction. Lossless WebP photos are generated by making use of a number of transformation methods to photographs to compress them.

WebP Advantages

WebP lossless photos are usually 26% smaller than PNG, and WebP lossy photos are 25–34% smaller than JPEG photos of comparable high quality. Animation assist makes them a superb alternative for GIF photos as effectively. The next exhibits a clear PNG picture on the left and the corresponding WebP picture on the best generated by the Squoosh app with a 26% measurement discount.

the screenshot shows a transparent PNG image on the left and the corresponding WebP image on the right generated by the Squoosh app with a 26% size reduction.

(Massive preview)

Moreover, WebP affords different advantages like:

  • Transparency
    WebP has a lossless 8-bit transparency channel with solely 22% extra bytes than PNG. It additionally helps lossy RGB transparency, which is a function distinctive to WebP.
  • Metadata
    The WebP file format helps EXIF photograph metadata and excessive reminiscence profile (XMP) digital doc metadata. It might additionally comprise an ICC shade profile.
  • Animation
    WebP helps true-color animated photos.

Observe: Within the case of clear, vector-like photos such because the above, an optimized SVG might in the end ship a sharper, smaller file in comparison with a raster format.

WebP Tooling And Help

Through the years, ecosystems apart from Google have adopted WebP, and there are various instruments accessible to create, view and cargo WebP information.

Serving And Viewing WebP Recordsdata

WebP is supported on the most recent variations of virtually all main browsers right now.

WebP images in the browser

(Massive preview)

If builders want to serve WebP on different browsers sooner or later, they will achieve this utilizing the <image> aspect or request headers as proven within the part on AVIF.

Picture Content material Supply Networks (CDN) additionally assist responsive photos with automated format choice for photos in WebP or AVIF relying on the browser assist. WebP plug-ins can be found for different in style stacks like WordPress, Joomla, Drupal, and so on. Preliminary assist for WebP can be accessible in WordPress core, beginning with WordPress 5.8.

You possibly can view WebP photos simply by opening them in a browser that helps them. Moreover, you can even preview them on Home windows and macOS utilizing an add-on. Putting in the Fast Look plug-in for WebP (qlImageSize) would mean you can preview WebP information utilizing the Fast Look utility. The WebP group has revealed precompiled libraries and utilities for the WebP codec for Home windows, macOS, and Linux. Utilizing these on Home windows permits you to preview WebP photos in File Explorer or Home windows Picture Viewer.

Changing photos to WebP

Along with the libraries supplied by the WebP group, a number of free, open-source, and industrial picture enhancing instruments assist WebP.

Like AVIF, Squoosh may also convert information to WebP on-line, as proven within the earlier part. XnConvert is a utility you could set up on the desktop to transform totally different picture codecs, together with WebP. XnConvert may also assist with stripping and enhancing metadata, cropping and resizing, brightness and distinction, customizing shade depth, blurring and sharpening, masks and watermarks, and different transforms.

Node.js Modules:
Imagemin is a well-liked picture minification module with an add-on for changing photos to WebP (imagemin-webp). The add-on helps each lossy and lossless WebP modes.

A number of apps for picture conversion and manipulation assist the WebP format. These embody Sketch, GIMP, ImageMagick, and so on. A Photoshop plug-in for WebP can be accessible.

WebP Manufacturing Utilization

On account of its compression advantages over JPEG and PNG, Many massive firms use WebP in manufacturing to scale back prices and reduce internet web page load occasions. Google reviews 30–35% financial savings utilizing WebP over different lossy compression schemes, serving 43 billion picture requests a day, 26% of these being lossless compression.

To achieve its massive consumer base in rising markets the place knowledge is pricey, Fb began serving WebP photos to Android customers. They noticed, “knowledge financial savings of 25 to 35 p.c in contrast with JPG, and 80 p.c in contrast with PNG”.

WebP Gotchas

In its early days, a considerable draw back with WebP was the shortage of browser and tooling assist. There are nonetheless few trade-offs with WebP when contemplating all of the encompasses a trendy format ought to ideally assist.

  • WebP is restricted to 8-bit shade precision. Because of this, it can’t assist HDR/broad gamut photos.
  • WebP doesn’t assist lossy photos with out chroma subsampling. Lossy WebP works completely with an 8-bit YCbCr 4:2:0, whereas lossless WebP works with the RGBA format. This will have an effect on photos with tremendous particulars, chromatic textures, or coloured textual content. See beneath for an instance.
  • It doesn’t assist progressive decoding, nevertheless does assist incremental decoding. This will considerably compensate for that, however the impact on rendering will be totally different.

generation of WebP files

(Massive preview)

You must ideally generate WebP information from the highest quality supply information accessible. Changing substandard JPEGs to WebP’s is just not very environment friendly because you lose on high quality twice.


Summarizing all of the details about the 4 codecs JPEG, PNG, AVIF, and WebP and evaluating and quantifying strengths and weaknesses as offered within the earlier part, we’ve give you the next desk.

Observe: The variety of stars is predicated on a basic opinion and will differ for particular use circumstances.

table with the strengths and weaknesses of JPEG, PNG, AVIF, and WebP

(Massive preview)

Following are a number of the key factors to be thought-about when referring to this desk.

  • Compression for photographic and non-photographic photos might additional differ based mostly on the constancy (high quality) of the pictures. We now have indicated an total rating right here.
  • You must select high quality and chroma subsampling settings based mostly on the aim of the pictures. Low to medium-fidelity photos could also be acceptable in most eventualities on the internet, e.g., for information, social media, and e-commerce. Picture archival, film, or pictures web sites require excessive constancy photos. You must take a look at the precise financial savings as a result of compression for prime constancy earlier than changing to a different format.
  • Lack of progressive decoding assist and pace could also be an issue for encoding/decoding AVIF information. For web sites with average-sized photos, the byte financial savings as a result of compression can compensate for pace and the absence of progressive decoding as photos get downloaded rapidly.
  • When evaluating compression supplied by picture codecs, examine file sizes on the identical DSSIM.
  • The standard setting used when encoding needn’t be the identical for various codecs to yield the identical high quality of photos. A JPEG encoded at a high quality setting of 60 could also be much like an AVIF at a high quality setting of fifty and a WebP at a high quality setting of 65, as instructed by this submit.
  • Intensive research are nonetheless required to measure the precise influence on LCP when evaluating codecs.
  • We now have not included different codecs like JPEG XL and HEIC on this comparability. JPEG XL remains to be in a comparatively nascent stage, and solely Apple units assist HEIC (whereas Safari doesn’t). Royalty and license charges additional complicate assist for HEIC.

AVIF does examine many of the packing containers total, and WebP has higher assist and affords higher compression when in comparison with JPEG or PNG. As such, it’s best to undoubtedly think about WebP assist when optimizing photos in your web site. Evaluating AVIF if it meets your necessities and introducing it as a progressive enhancement may present worth because the format will get adopted throughout totally different browsers and platforms. With high quality comparability tooling and bettering encoding speeds utilizing AVIF would in the end get simpler.

With due to Leena Sohoni-Kasture for her heavy enter into this text in addition to Patrick Meenan, Frank Galligan and Yoav Weiss for his or her opinions.

A Smashing Observe

Earlier this yr, we revealed a model new e-book with Addy on all the things you’ll want to know to optimize the way you compress, serve and preserve photos — boosting efficiency alongside the best way. We’re delivery the books at no cost worldwide, and when you get the e-book now, additionally, you will obtain a hand-written postcard by Addy with a private message.

Each book is now shipped with a hand-written note by Addy Osmani himself.

Every e-book is now shipped with a hand-written observe by Addy Osmani himself. (Massive preview)

Image Optimization

Print + eBook


High quality hardcover. Free worldwide delivery. 100 days money-back-guarantee.



DRM-free, after all.

ePUB, Kindle, PDF.
Included with Smashing Membership.

Smashing Editorial
(vf, yk, il)

Supply hyperlink

Leave a Reply